#ONHUMANTERMS— A public conversation
The future of AI should be discussedOnHumanTerms.
AI Twin shows what we can build. #OnHumanTerms asks what we should build and invites the people whose lives it will touch to set the rules with us.




If an AI Twin could represent you, what is one rule you would never allow it to break?
Your rule couldn’t be shared. Check your connection and press “Share my rule” again.
Responses are stored for review by the Fusemachines team before anything is published.
A growing public archive of the rules people would set for an AI that represents them.
No voices here yet. Be the first to share a rule.
AI Twin shows whatwe can build.#OnHumanTerms askswhat we should build.
We do not believe the future of AI should be shaped by technology companies alone.
Engineers and researchers should be involved. But so should the people whose lives will ultimately be affected by it.
Who belongs in this conversation
- Engineers/
- Researchers/
- Policymakers/
- Business leaders/
- Artists/
- Teachers/
- Parents/
- Workers/
- Students/
- Everyday people
The future of AI should be discussed on human terms.
The questions arebigger than thetechnology.
We are exploring AI Twin not simply to demonstrate technical capability, but to understand the implications of AI capable of representing people.
- 01
Build
Create ambitious technology that demonstrates what our teams are capable of.
- 02
Question
Explore the difficult questions that come with technology capable of representing humans.
- 03
Listen
Bring voices outside the technology industry into the conversation.
- 04
Connect
Create a bridge between technologists, businesses, policymakers and the public.
#OnHumanTerms
The future of AIshould be builton human terms.
We’re building the technology. Now we want to hear from you.